GeForce GTX 675M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675M will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 675M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 675M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 675M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 675M is build with Fermi architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 675M is 320 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
30−33
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 675M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
170−180
150−160
medium / 768p
140−150
120−130
ultra / 1080p
70−75
60−65
QHD / 1440p
40−45
35−40
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
100−110
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
75−80
65−70
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−12
9−10
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
75−80
65−70
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
65−70
60−65
medium / 768p
55−60
50−55
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
85−90
medium / 1080p
95−100
95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
14−16
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
35−40
30−35
medium / 768p
21−24
20−22
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
high / 768p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
Fermi
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N13E-GS1
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
22 March 2012
3 January 2017
Pipelines
384
48
Core clock speed
620 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
39.7 billion/sec
55.20
Floating-point performance
952.3 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
256bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
384
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
59 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
