GeForce GTX 675M vs Quadro CX
When comparing GeForce GTX 675M and Quadro CX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 675M and Quadro CX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro CX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is used in Laptops, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 675M is 18 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro CX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 110% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | Fermi | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1 | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion/sec | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 1.3 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 675M vs FirePro M6100
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Quadro CX vs FirePro M6100
- Quadro CX vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce GTX 675M vs GeForce GT 645M
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics