GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 675M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 280 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M270DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 675M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Fortnite is 90% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | N13E-GS1 | Topaz |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 11 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion/sec | 22.56 |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 675M vs FirePro M6100
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs FirePro M6100
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon E6760
- GeForce GTX 675M vs HD Graphics 515
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R7 M270DX vs HD Graphics 515