GeForce GTX 675M vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675M and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 675M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675M.
- GeForce GTX 675M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675M and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 675M is 46 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 675M and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 675M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GS1 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 39.7 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 952.3 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 59 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |