FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 675MX
When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 675MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 675MX.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 675MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 675MX uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 675MX has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 115 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 675MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 675MX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Fortnite is 78% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 675MX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | N13E-GSR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 48.0 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |