FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 675MX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 675MX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against GeForce GTX 675MX, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 675MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 675MX uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 675MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 350 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 675MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 105% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 675MX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N13E-GSR |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 48.0 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 63 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R9 270
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- FirePro S7000 vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs FirePro W4100