FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 675MX
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 675MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 675MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 675MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 675MX uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 675MX has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 675MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 675MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 25 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 675MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9250 is 186 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Dota 2 is 34% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Far Cry 5 is 140% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Fortnite is 61% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 675MX | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N13E-GSR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 48.0 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,256 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GT 650M
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- FireStream 9250 vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs FirePro W4100