GeForce GTX 675MX vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675MX will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 675MX | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 675MX has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 145 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTX 675MX and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 675MX | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GSR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |