GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 675MX and Radeon HD 4870 X2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 675MX will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 4870 X2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon HD 4870 X2
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 286 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 186% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 675MX has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 4870 X2.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4870 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 4870 X2 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 675MX and Radeon HD 4870 X2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4870 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon HD 4870 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | Radeon HD 4870 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N13E-GSR | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 12 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 960 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 700 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 28.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 2x 1,120.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs FirePro W4100
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 M465
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs Radeon R7 M465