FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 680M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 680M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 680M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 680M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tahiti | N13E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 758 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 80.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 100 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 860M SLI
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
- FirePro S10000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- FirePro S10000 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M