FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 680M
When choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680M.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 230 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 680M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N13E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 80.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 100 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S7000 vs Radeon R9 270
- FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 270
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- FirePro S7000 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- FirePro S7000 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M