FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GTX 680M
In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and GeForce GTX 680M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
GeForce GTX 680M
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
FirePro S9050 and GeForce GTX 680M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−12
9−10
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
180−190
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
85−90
55−60
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−35
high / 768p
160−170
140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
80−85
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
70−75
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
FirePro S9050 and GeForce GTX 680M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro S9050.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
GeForce GTX 680M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
N13E-GTX
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
4 June 2012
Pipelines
1792
1344
Core clock speed
900 MHz
720 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
80.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
2,038 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
115.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
100 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price