FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 680M

In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 680M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:

Main Specs

  FireStream 9270 GeForce GTX 680M
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 100 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI No outputs
  Check Price
  • FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
  • FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
  • GeForce GTX 680M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
  • FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
  • FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
  • Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 30 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
  • FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 680M - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 5−6 16−18
ultra / 1080p 2−3 9−10
QHD / 1440p 2−3 4−5
4K / 2160p 4−5
low / 720p 14−16 30−35
medium / 1080p 7−8 20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

  FireStream 9270 GeForce GTX 680M
Architecture TeraScale Kepler
Code name RV770 N13E-GTX
Type Desktop Laptop
Release date 13 November 2008 4 June 2012
Pipelines 800 1344
Core clock speed 750 MHz 720 MHz
Boost Clock 758 MHz
Transistor count 956 million 3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 30.00 80.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance 1,200.0 gflops 2,038 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s 115.2 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 10.1 (10_1) 12 API
Shader Model 4.1 5.1
OpenGL 3.3 4.5
OpenCL 1.1 1.1
Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
CUDA +
CUDA cores 1344
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
SLI options +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 100 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
  Check Price