FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 680M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 680M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GeForce GTX 680M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 680M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 680M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 680M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 680M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 680M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N13E-GTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 4 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 80.6 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2,038 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M