GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro P2000
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M
Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
5 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 680M has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro P2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P2000 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 356 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 5208 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 135% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
24−27
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
QHD / 1440p
9−10
35−40
4K / 2160p
6−7
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 124% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
210−220
250−260
medium / 768p
180−190
220−230
ultra / 1080p
100−110
180−190
QHD / 1440p
55−60
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−35
70−75
high / 768p
140−150
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
QHD / 1440p
16−18
30−33
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
QHD / 1440p
16−18
30−33
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
180−190
medium / 1080p
55−60
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 93% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−11
30−35
4K / 2160p
10−11
24−27
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
90−95
140−150
medium / 768p
80−85
130−140
high / 1080p
30−35
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 135% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
60−65
130−140
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
20−22
50−55
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
55−60
high / 768p
55−60
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M
Quadro P2000
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
N13E-GTX
GP106
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
4 June 2012
6 February 2017
Pipelines
1344
1024
Core clock speed
720 MHz
1076 MHz
Boost Clock
758 MHz
1480 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
16 nm
Texture fill rate
80.6 billion/sec
94.72
Floating-point performance
2,038 gflops
3,031 gflops
Length
201 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
160 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
115.2 GB/s
140.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.19 kh/s
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
100 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
