GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M270X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R9 M270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 5 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680M is 675 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Fortnite is 96% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Minecraft is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N13E-GTX | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 4 June 2012 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion/sec | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R7 M370
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Radeon R9 M270X vs Radeon R7 M370