GeForce GTX 680M vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
GeForce GTX 680M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680M.
- GeForce GTX 680M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680M is 146 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GTX 680M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2070 is 1188 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 680M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
GeForce GTX 680M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GTX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 4 June 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 758 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.6 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 100 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- GeForce GTX 680M vs Quadro M1000M
- Tesla C2070 vs Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire
- Tesla C2070 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 590
- GeForce GTX 680M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 590
- Tesla C2070 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost