FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 680MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 5 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 680MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 433% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 122% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 268% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 640% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 23 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3540 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |