FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 680MX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 680MX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 186% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 680MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 23 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3540 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 57 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |