FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 680MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 680MX.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 22% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 95 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 680MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 514 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 411% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 105% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 247% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 161% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 362% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 23 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3540 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |