FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 680MX
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 680MX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 680MX.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 105 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 680MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 28% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 70% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 55% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 68% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 23 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3540 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |