GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTX 680MX
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 680MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 680MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 713% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 680MX - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 680MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 55 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 680MX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 700 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTX 680MX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 513% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTX 680MX | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 23 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3540 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |