GeForce GTX 680MX vs GeForce GTX 950A
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GTX 950A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680MX will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 950A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 62% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GTX 950A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 950A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 950A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 273 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GTX 950A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 498 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 October 2012 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 44.96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 32.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P1000
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro K4200
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro P1000
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K4200
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU