GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R7 A265
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 A265 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680MX will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 A265 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 A265 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A265 is 5 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 585% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | − |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 132% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 326% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 525% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 243% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 1150% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Opal | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 October 2012 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P1000
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro K4200
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Quadro P1000
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Quadro K4200
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics