GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 M350
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 248% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M350 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M350 is 5 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 268% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 528% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Opal | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 779.5 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Check Price |