GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 5 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 1375 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 206% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 177% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 214% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Venus | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| SLI options | + | |
| 3D Vision | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |