GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 60 Watt.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 480 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 750 Ti - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
20−22
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
1−2
40−45
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
230−240
medium / 768p
27−30
200−210
ultra / 1080p
7−8
120−130
QHD / 1440p
−
90−95
4K / 2160p
−
50−55
high / 768p
16−18
160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
80−85
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Dota 2 is 296% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
120−130
medium / 1080p
0−1
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
35−40
low / 768p
18−20
100−110
medium / 768p
−
90−95
high / 1080p
0−1
40−45
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
0−1
70−75
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Architecture
G9x
Maxwell
Code name
N10E-GS1
GM107
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
2 March 2009
18 February 2014
Pipelines
64
640
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
1020 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
43.40
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
1,389 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.0
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.4
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
64
640
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
2-way
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Blu Ray 3D
+
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price