GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 750 Ti stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 6200, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 300% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 750 Ti is 720 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
4−5
ultra / 1080p
12−14
3−4
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
40−45
12−14
medium / 1080p
24−27
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
7−8
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
65−70
16−18
medium / 1080p
35−40
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
230−240
110−120
medium / 768p
200−210
85−90
ultra / 1080p
120−130
40−45
QHD / 1440p
90−95
24−27
4K / 2160p
50−55
−
high / 768p
160−170
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 148% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
80−85
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
24−27
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
3−4
low / 720p
50−55
12−14
medium / 1080p
27−30
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
low / 720p
120−130
50−55
medium / 1080p
70−75
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Fortnite is 186% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
9−10
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
18−20
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 246% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
100−110
40−45
medium / 768p
90−95
35−40
high / 1080p
40−45
8−9
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
12−14
3−4
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
70−75
16−18
medium / 768p
45−50
12−14
high / 1080p
24−27
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 750 Ti in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GM107
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
18 February 2014
2 June 2015
Pipelines
640
48
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
40.80
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Quick Sync
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price