GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro M3000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro M3000M has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro M3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M3000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 30 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 4995 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−12
35−40
4K / 2160p
8−9
18−20
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
250−260
medium / 768p
200−210
220−230
ultra / 1080p
120−130
180−190
QHD / 1440p
90−95
110−120
4K / 2160p
50−55
70−75
high / 768p
160−170
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 750 Ti and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
24−27
45−50
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
QHD / 1440p
18−20
27−30
4K / 2160p
8−9
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
80−85
medium / 1080p
27−30
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
120−130
180−190
medium / 1080p
70−75
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
30−35
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
QHD / 1440p
14−16
30−35
4K / 2160p
12−14
24−27
low / 720p
65−70
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
100−110
140−150
medium / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
40−45
70−75
ultra / 1080p
16−18
30−35
QHD / 1440p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
20−22
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
110−120
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
100−110
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
35−40
65−70
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
70−75
130−140
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
24−27
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 750 Ti.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Quadro M3000M
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Code name
GM107
GM204
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
18 February 2014
2 October 2015
Pipelines
640
1,024
Core clock speed
1020 MHz
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
Transistor count
1,870 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
43.40
67.20
Floating-point performance
1,389 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
5.7" (14.5 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5.4 GB/s
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
160 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
5.2
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.25 kh/s
CUDA cores
640
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
183 Mh/s
253 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
0.51 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.3 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
74.4 Sol/s
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Check Price
Check Price