FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 170 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 385% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 190 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 5108 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Whistler-XT | GK104 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 27 September 2013 |
Pipelines | 480 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 915 MHz |
Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 109.8 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 192.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 156 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M5950 vs GeForce 845M
- FirePro M5950 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GeForce 845M
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
- FirePro M5950 vs FirePro S10000
- FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs FirePro S10000
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X