GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 1316% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Fortnite is 357% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Bristol Ridge |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 | 1 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3100 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 109.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 156 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs FirePro S10000
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs FirePro S10000
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs Radeon R9 M295X
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs UHD Graphics 630
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs UHD Graphics 617
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 630
- Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge vs UHD Graphics 617