GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R7 M350
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R7 M350. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R7 M350. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Radeon R7 M350
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 170 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 385% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M350 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 190 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is 5008 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Forza Horizon 4 is 680% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Minecraft is 41% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M350. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R7 M350 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Opal |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 September 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 109.8 | 19.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,634 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 156 Mh/s | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 6 | |