GeForce GTX 760 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760 will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)
170 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
System Shared
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 760 has 1033% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 760 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GeForce GTX 760 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 760 is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 680 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
24−27
4−5
ultra / 1080p
14−16
3−4
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
45−50
12−14
medium / 1080p
30−35
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
35−40
−
ultra / 1080p
30−35
7−8
QHD / 1440p
18−20
0−1
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
75−80
16−18
medium / 1080p
40−45
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Battlefield 5 is 354% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
240−250
110−120
medium / 768p
210−220
85−90
ultra / 1080p
130−140
40−45
QHD / 1440p
100−110
24−27
4K / 2160p
60−65
−
high / 768p
180−190
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
70−75
medium / 768p
110−120
45−50
ultra / 1080p
85−90
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
30−35
6−7
ultra / 1080p
27−30
5−6
QHD / 1440p
21−24
−
4K / 2160p
9−10
3−4
low / 720p
60−65
12−14
medium / 1080p
30−35
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Far Cry 5 is 371% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
35−40
12−14
ultra / 1080p
30−35
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
low / 720p
140−150
50−55
medium / 1080p
85−90
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Fortnite is 240% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
40−45
9−10
ultra / 1080p
30−35
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
0−1
4K / 2160p
16−18
−
low / 720p
80−85
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Forza Horizon 4 is 338% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
110−120
40−45
medium / 768p
100−110
35−40
high / 1080p
45−50
8−9
ultra / 1080p
20−22
5−6
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Grand Theft Auto V is 213% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
16−18
3−4
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
QHD / 1440p
12−14
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
8−9
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
80−85
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
45−50
8−9
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 275% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
16−18
medium / 768p
55−60
12−14
high / 1080p
30−35
7−8
ultra / 1080p
16−18
5−6
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 390% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
45−50
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name
GK104
Broadwell GT3e
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
25 June 2013
2 June 2015
Pipelines
1152
48
Core clock speed
980 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
94.1 billion/sec
40.80
Floating-point performance
2,378 gflops
883.2 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1152
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
83 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3.5 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Blu Ray 3D
+
Minimum recommended system power
500 Watt
PhysX
+
Check Price
Check Price