GeForce GTX 760 vs Quadro 2000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro 2000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro 2000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTX 760 Check Price

Quadro 2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 760	Quadro 2000
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	62 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 760 has 174% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000.
GeForce GTX 760 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 760 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 760 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 2000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 355 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.
GeForce GTX 760 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 2000 - by 40 nm process technology.
Quadro 2000 is 169 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 760.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	14−16	0−1
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	45−50	10−12
medium / 1080p	30−35	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 600% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	35−40	−
ultra / 1080p	30−35	3−4
QHD / 1440p	18−20	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	75−80	12−14
medium / 1080p	40−45	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Battlefield 5 is 614% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro 2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	240−250	110−120
medium / 768p	210−220	85−90
ultra / 1080p	130−140	35−40
QHD / 1440p	100−110	−
4K / 2160p	60−65	10−11
high / 768p	180−190	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 170% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
GeForce GTX 760 and Quadro 2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	110−120	45−50
ultra / 1080p	85−90	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	30−35	2−3
ultra / 1080p	27−30	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	−
4K / 2160p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	60−65	10−11
medium / 1080p	30−35	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	35−40	−
ultra / 1080p	30−35	5−6
QHD / 1440p	18−20	1−2
low / 720p	140−150	45−50
medium / 1080p	85−90	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Fortnite is 373% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	40−45	3−4
ultra / 1080p	30−35	−
QHD / 1440p	18−20	0−1
4K / 2160p	16−18	−
low / 720p	80−85	14−16
medium / 1080p	45−50	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Forza Horizon 4 is 612% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	110−120	40−45
medium / 768p	100−110	−
high / 1080p	45−50	3−4
ultra / 1080p	20−22	2−3
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Grand Theft Auto V is 281% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	16−18	1−2
ultra / 1080p	12−14	0−1
QHD / 1440p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	3−4
medium / 1080p	21−24	2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Metro Exodus is 1350% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	80−85	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 123% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
4K / 2160p	3−4	−
low / 720p	45−50	4−5
medium / 1080p	24−27	−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 650% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	90−95	8−9
medium / 768p	55−60	7−8
high / 1080p	30−35	3−4
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 880% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	12−14
high / 768p	55−60	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro 2000.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 760	Quadro 2000
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF106
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 June 2013	24 December 2010
Pipelines	1152	192
Core clock speed	980 MHz	625 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	94.1 billion/sec	20.00
Floating-point performance	2,378 gflops	480.0 gflops
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)	178 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	41.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	+	2.1
CUDA cores	1152
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	4 displays
HDMI	+
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
3D Gaming	+
3D Vision	+
3D Vision Live	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	83 Mh/s	31 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	3.5 Mh/s
Blu Ray 3D	+
Minimum recommended system power	500 Watt
PhysX	+
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTX 760 vs Quadro 2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares