FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 760A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 760A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against GeForce GTX 760A, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 66% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 28 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 760A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 492 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GK106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |