FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 760A
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 760A, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4150 stacks up against GeForce GTX 760A, check out specs charts below.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 760A
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M4150 is 87 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 760A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 25% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Opal | GK106 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 628 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |