FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTX 760A
When comparing FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 57% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5950 is 97 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 3108 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | GK106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |