FirePro W4190M vs GeForce GTX 760A
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A.
GeForce GTX 760A
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 197 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Minecraft is 3% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GK106 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |