FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 760A
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 760A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 760A
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9270 has 190% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 760A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 122 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 408 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |