GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce GTX 760A
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 760A. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and GeForce GTX 760A. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
GeForce GTX 760A
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 36% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 902 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 3992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 572% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 750% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 370% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 290% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 840% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 644% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK106 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | no data | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 657 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |