GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 760A
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GeForce GTX 760A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and GeForce GTX 760A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 10% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 407 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 5992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 335% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G62 Max-Q | GK106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 April 2020 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 628 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 657 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.80 | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870