GeForce GTX 460M vs GeForce GTX 760A
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M and GeForce GTX 760A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 460M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 10% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460M.
- GeForce GTX 460M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 460M has 1534 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 460M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M is 722 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 460M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2758 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Fortnite is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in World of Tanks is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 460M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M | GeForce GTX 760A | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GK106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 628 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 16.1 billion/sec | 42.05 |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 33 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |