GeForce GTX 485M vs GeForce GTX 760A
When choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 760A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 760A.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 485M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 760A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and GeForce GTX 760A - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 244 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 485M and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 485M | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | GK106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 6 January 2010 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 384 | 628 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 550
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 485M vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870