GeForce GTX 675MX vs GeForce GTX 760A
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 760A. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 760A. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 675MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 675MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 675MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 675MX has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce GTX 760A uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 760A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 675MX is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 760A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 760A are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 28 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
- GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 760A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2208 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 675MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Battlefield 5 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 760A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 675MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 675MX in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 675MX | GeForce GTX 760A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N13E-GSR | GK106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 17 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 960 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 628 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 42.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,256 gflops | 1,009 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64.13 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 63 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
- GeForce GTX 760A vs FirePro W4100
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 675MX vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870