GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 965M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce GTX 965M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 965M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 316 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce GTX 965M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 1508 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce GTX 965M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK106 | N16E-GS, N16E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 January 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 944 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 950 / 1151 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 2,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 73.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,355 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1 |
CUDA | 3.0 | + |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |