GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce MX110
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX110, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 760A stacks up against GeForce MX110, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX110 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 83% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX110 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX110 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX110 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 337 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX110 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 2208 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Battlefield 5 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Fortnite is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Minecraft is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX110 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX110 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK106 | N16V-GMR1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |