GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce MX250
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX250 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 450% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 890 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GeForce MX250 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | GK106 | N17S-G2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 20 February 2019 |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 1518 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 6.1 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |