GeForce GTX 760A vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K240Q.
GeForce GTX 760A
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760A has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 117 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |