GeForce GTX 760A vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 760A will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760A
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 309% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 117 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 190% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 78% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK106 | GK104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |