GeForce GTX 760A vs Iris Graphics 550
When comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 550, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 550 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 760A
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 266% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 62 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 760A is 328 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Battlefield 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 760A and Iris Graphics 550 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 71% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 550 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 760A | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | GK106 | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon HD 4870
- Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Iris Graphics 550 vs Radeon HD 4870
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 760A vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 485M